On 7/16/06, Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Did you mean to send this to the Shale dev@, Craig?
Yep ... sorry for the noise :-) Craig On 7/17/06, Craig McClanahan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> As part of our transition to an Apache top level project (TLP), we are > obligated to submit a report to the ASF Board every month for the first > three months, then quarterly thereafter. Here's what I am proposing to send > for July, which needs to be forwarded in a couple days. (I'll also create a > "pmc" subdirectory in the repository to archive these things, since there is > nothing non-public we need to worry about). Comments? > > =========================================================================== > > Apache Shale Board Report for July 2006 > ======================================= > > > Overview > -------- > > Per the Apache Board resolution at the June 2006 meeting, Apache Shale was > created as a top level project. This is the first of the "every month for > the > first three months" status reports to the Board on activities within the > project. > > All of the initial root and infrastructure requests have been completed. We > are still de-tangling a few loose ends (wiki and JIRA instance shared with > the > Struts project), but these are not considered to be urgent. > > > PMC and Committer Changes > ------------------------- > > None. > > > Current Development Activities > ------------------------------ > > As the creation of Shale as a TLP was coming to fruition, we had nearly > completed a migration to a Maven2 based build environment. This work has > been substantially completed, and Shale is now completely M2 based for its > build infrastructure. Nightly builds are still currently hosted on my > (Craig's) home desktop, but steps are underway to migrate this to a > Continuum > instance on Apache infrastructure. > > We have initiated a contest to pick an official logo for the Apache Shale > project -- details are at <http://wiki.apache.org/shale/LogoContest >. The > entries so far have ranged from humorous to compelling ... it will be > interesting > to pick a final winner. > > Current release activities are focused on a 1.0.3 release, which is still > likely > to be considered "beta" quality (due to dependence on unreleased components, > plus some outstanding bugs), but which has been requested by some downstream > users to avoid their need to depend on snapshots. > > > Submitted by, > Craig McClanahan --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
