> What's the deal with FreeMarker?
In freemarker POST-incubator is
<@saf.url .... />
now, it would be
<@s.url ... />
if 's' is used instead of 'saf', so i guess we don't have the problem as
velocity
rgds.
----- Original Message ----
From: Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Struts Developers List <dev@struts.apache.org>
Sent: Tuesday, 18 July, 2006 7:49:41 PM
Subject: Re: [s2] Tag prefixes
So, before it was
> wwurl
and now it woud be
> surl
Hmmm, I don't know that {surl} is much worse that {wwurl} :)
Are we *required* to map directly from the JSP prefix to the Velocity
"prefix", or is that just a convention?
If we had some lattitude, I might suggest
> svurl
as the Velcocity "prefix", as in Struts Velocity, but I don't know
that we'd want to retrofit that convention to the JSP tags.
What's the deal with FreeMarker? Do we have a similar problem there?
-Ted.
On 7/18/06, Don Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ok, I know we already had this discussion, and the general consensus,
> IIRC, was to use "s:" to replace "saf:". However, this doesn't work so
> well when it comes to the Velocity tags. In that case, the prefix
> doesn't have the "." separator, so instead of "s:url", you have "surl",
> and I'm not sure that's what we want :)
>
> The other possibility is to use "s2", although I hate to tie the number
> 2 in where we don't have to. Any ideas?
>
> Don
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
