On 8/21/06, Don Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I think we should remove the method and namespace attributes on the tags and elevate the status of the URL in Struts 2.
/s/Struts 2/Struts 3/ For Struts 2, I think we should go with pretty much what we got. All of these ideas are both interesting and useful, but I'd like to see them proven in some of our own applications first. I know Patrick has found Able useful, and if the rest of us find it useful in our own applications, then it could be the starting point for "phase 2". But, from the beginning, we agreed that Struts 2 would be based on the proven foundation of WebWork 2, and the "next generation" of web application development would be a second phase (Struts 3). Now, before any one brings up marketing or "user acceptance" or bringing out too many versions too soon: I don't care about any of that. I care about creating the web application framework that I want to use with my own applications. Right now. Today. I come here because the web application framework that I want to use is more than I can write on my own. Right now, today, a lot of the people that could help with Struts 2 are still working on WebWork 2.2.x. I don't want to go off on any tangents that are going to tempt those people away from working on Struts 2. We need to get Struts 2 out the door now, so that we can complete the merger of our communities, and consolidate our resources. I am onboard for the navel-gazing, and I'm onboard for creating a next-generation web application framework that combines scalability with ease of use, but we should target the real changes for Struts Next, not Struts Now. -Ted. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
