On 8/21/06, Patrick Lightbody <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Sure, I agree with all of that. And I've said I'm opening to nailing this down more with conventions and/or annotations. I'm even open to a switch to turn it off.
Which is where we are, right now, today.
So let's dig deep and get to a consensus on what we think the "right"
way to recommend
working with Struts is.
I'm all for that (or at least the right ways), and I think we all would agree that the switch isn't going to be removed unless we are all happy with whatever alternatives we find. As PMC members, we each have the unilateral right to veto a change to the codebase on technical grounds. If alternatives can't accomplish what the bang can accomplish, without bloating or obfuscating the configuration, then I think everyone would agree that would be a technical ground. (Or at least one of us would: if the technical ground isn't obvious, all you need is a second.) In my own mind, I never thought we'd remove the switch before "phase 2", when there might be other breaks in backward compatiblity. Right now, the last thing I want to do is disenfranchise the WebWork community, because I want guys like Rainer over here helping me push out Struts 2.0.x releases. :) -Ted. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
