On 8/22/06, Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Say, wasn't there a mention of some package that renamed packages dynamically or something? That's the real issue. Two versions of the same package name on the same classpath.
jarjar In the case of logging though, we should just use java.util.logging. If you still want to use log4j, why not write a j.u.logging Handler which logs to log4j? Do we really need an API to decouple us from an API which decouples us from a logging implementation, or is one level of indirection sufficient? This is why everyone makes fun of clogging. Bob
