Very cool. That looks like what i was looking for. Thanks :)
On 8/22/06, Bob Lee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 8/22/06, Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Say, wasn't there a mention of some package that renamed packages > dynamically or something? That's the real issue. Two versions of the > same package name on the same classpath. jarjar In the case of logging though, we should just use java.util.logging. If you still want to use log4j, why not write a j.u.logging Handler which logs to log4j? Do we really need an API to decouple us from an API which decouples us from a logging implementation, or is one level of indirection sufficient? This is why everyone makes fun of clogging. Bob
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
