This topic NOT about chaining (Paul, I am very sorry to bring the chaining up).
What Paul talks about is including an action URL into a JSP page. Consider a Model 1 application, JSP page can dynamically include other resources with <jsp:include> or with <c:import>. Now consider that a JSP page includes a Struts action instead of JSP file. Included Struts action forwards to a JSP file, the latter renders a fragment of a composite page. There is no disagreement. On 9/13/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
If you're chaining actions for different blocks of the display, how do you handle disagreements between the appropriate forward of one block vs. another? This seems problematic, to me. > -----Original Message----- > From: Paul Benedict [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > Behalf Of Paul Benedict > Sent: Wednesday, September 13, 2006 3:07 PM > To: Dinwiddie, George > Cc: dev@struts.apache.org > Subject: Re: Private Actions Mappings? > > > By performing an "action", it is getting data from a service. It can > also decide the flow of display by selecting the appropriate forward. > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Coming in very late, here, but I just wanted clarification. > It sounds > > to me as if you're using actions like a tile controller. In other > > words, it's not performing any "action" or deciding the flow of > > display, but merely gathering data and putting it into scope for > > display. Is that a correct description? > > > > - George
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
