Since we haven't had any takers on fixing the XDoclet processing, I doubt that anyone is married to the XDoclet approach. Meanwhile, other new features are embracing annotations, so I would suggest that annotations would actually be better than the old XDoclet approach. After all, XDoclet is basically a precursor to annotations.
So, if you want to work on an APT patch for WW-1392, I'll review it. -Ted. On 11/16/06, Musachy Barroso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I was playing with apt (http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.5.0/docs/guide/apt/GettingStarted.html) today and it is pretty easy to use, I could get the tld generation working in a few days, the only thing is that we would have to use annotations instead of javadoc comments, would that be a problem? musachy Musachy Barroso wrote: > Could we use apt? > > musachy > > Ted Husted wrote: >> On 11/15/06, Musachy Barroso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> Is anything going to be done for the TLD generation or we are just >>> going >>> to update it by hand (that's what I've been doing anyway) for now? >> >> We'd like to go back to using XDoclet, but need to workaround >> XDoclet's incompatbility with J5. >> >> * https://issues.apache.org/struts/browse/WW-1392 >> >> -Ted. >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >> > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-- HTH, Ted. * http://www.husted.com/struts/ --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
