Rene
I'm getting familiar with apt, if you can replace the javadocs with
annotations it would be nice (read: spare me the regexs :)), I think
nothing is using them right now so it won't break anything.
musachy
Ted Husted wrote:
If you and Musachy would like to work this out, Rene, that would great.
I've quite a bit on my plate already with bringing the MailReader up
to speed with all the other excellent changes we've made this month.
-Ted.
On 11/16/06, Rene Gielen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Ted, Musachy, others,
I remember this ticket... :-/
Got stuck with maven2 last time I looked into it, before with my
daytime business catched me again.
The ww taglib xdoclet generation was a hack of the original tld
generation stuff from xdoclet1, and that is one of the reasons why it
was that hard to integrate in the new maven build system.
I would really vote for switching apt, too. Annotations is one of the
best improvements tiger introduced, und using apt would give us true
flexibility while dropping build dependencies. And it is "standard".
For the conversion of javadoc comments to annotations, this would be
pretty easy to do with Idea, some nice regexp replacements & some
sensible review. I could offer my help on this, cause next week I've
got some time left :) Btw, we should also remember the html
artifacts produced by the tld generation, needed for snippet based
documentation.
Regards,
Rene
> Since we haven't had any takers on fixing the XDoclet
> processing, I
> doubt that anyone is married to the XDoclet approach.
> Meanwhile, other
> new features are embracing annotations, so I would
> suggest that
> annotations would actually be better than the old
> XDoclet approach.
> After all, XDoclet is basically a precursor to
> annotations.
>
> So, if you want to work on an APT patch for WW-1392,
> I'll review it.
>
> -Ted.
>
> On 11/16/06, Musachy Barroso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > I was playing with apt
> >
> (http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.5.0/docs/guide/apt/Getting
> Started.html)
> > today and it is pretty easy to use, I could get the
> tld generation
> > working in a few days, the only thing is that we
> would have to use
> > annotations instead of javadoc comments, would that
> be a problem?
> >
> > musachy
> >
> > Musachy Barroso wrote:
> > > Could we use apt?
> > >
> > > musachy
> > >
> > > Ted Husted wrote:
> > >> On 11/15/06, Musachy Barroso
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >>> Is anything going to be done for the TLD
> generation or we are just
> > >>> going
> > >>> to update it by hand (that's what I've been
> doing anyway) for now?
> > >>
> > >> We'd like to go back to using XDoclet, but need
> to workaround
> > >> XDoclet's incompatbility with J5.
> > >>
> > >> *
> https://issues.apache.org/struts/browse/WW-1392
> > >>
> > >> -Ted.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
