Dave Newton wrote:
From: David Durham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I kind of stumbled over the spring "glue" for struts, rereading the
wiki page a few times before the struts.xml action _class_ needs to
reference the bean name attribute from spring's configuration. Just
thinking about it a little more, that seems a bit esoteric. Would it
be better to have the class attribute be specified as "spring::bean"
or "spring:bean", something like that?
You can turn off the autowiring if you don't like how it works or
configure the actions explicitly (I think...)
I didn't find it particularly esoteric that if you have an id and setter
that match that it injects it for you, but that's just me :)
I don't think my first message was clear, and perhaps the problem is that I really only
have a cursory understanding of Struts 2, but my thinking is that if a configuration file
in a Java framework has an attribute named "class," then that refers to a Java
classname, e.g., com.dave.MyClass. And, indeed in struts.xml, the class usually does.
<action name="..." class="com.comp.MyAction" />
but in the spring integration it's:
<action name="..." class="SpringBeanName" />
This is great. It works great, SFAIK. I'm saying that perhaps that shoul be:
<action name="..." class="Spring:SpringBeanName" />
or something like that to kind of indicate to a developer, "Hey, this isn't a
standard java class name."
-DAve
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
