Don mentioned a separate tag library, so that would indicate another prefix, but there'd be no reason why the internal tag syntax would change.
To keep the codebase manageable, I believe we do need to make this change, and I'd rather make it now while we are in our first beta series than after the first Struts 2 GA. The plugin model might also open the door to other AJAX implementations of the same tags. -T. On 12/27/06, David H. DeWolf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Ok, as long as we keep the tag prefixes and tag names once they are abstracted from the plugin. At one point we talked about having a simple version which is extended by the dojo version and added additional (dojo-specific) featuers. It seems like the current names would be more likely be used for the core tags - not the dojo-enhanced ones. Ted Husted wrote: > A struts-dojo plugin shouldn't change the tag syntax. It should just > be a matter of adding the JAR, as we do for Spring, and JasperReports, > and Tiles, so forth. > > On 12/27/06, David H. DeWolf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Nope, that's the one I'm talking about. I got the impression we were >> going to keep it as is and thus break backwards compatibility in 2.0.2 >> -- and then mess with it again it when we create the plugin. . . >> >> David
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
