On 2/1/07, Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
All release *must* include the license.txt ... and ... all source
files *should* include the header. So, assuming there's a difference
between "must" and "should", I would say that we only need to correct
it in future releases.
* http://apache.org/legal/src-headers.html
The rationale for "should" is to cover the case where the source file
becomes detached from the distribution. And, in this case, we're only
talking about an interface.
From the discussion, I'm thinking 2.0.4 is only going to be beta
anyway, so we should just fix it for 2.0.5, and move on.
My understanding is that 'beta' or 'ga' makes no difference - they're
both distributed items and are the same as far as the legal policies
are concerned.
Even nightly builds are subject to the policies if we're deemed to be
actively telling people to download a file.
Hen
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
