I'm working on cleaning up the build issues with 2.0.5, with the hope
of tagging and rolling 2.0.6.
The only question is whether we want to roll 2.0.6 immediately, or
wait a day or two to see what else comes in. I'd say if not today,
then by, say, Thursday.
I also added a "Release Plan" section to the foot of 2.0.6 Release
Notes, so that we are in compliance with our bylaws:
Release Plan
* Struts 2.0.6 is a milestone version in the 2.0.x series.
o There is yet to be a GA release in this series.
* The Release Manager is Ted Husted.
* The tag date for the release is yet to be determined.
But, our copy on people does not seem to syncing with the copy on
cwiki. The autoexport is working, but the rsync is lagging. I'll look
into that too.
-Ted.
On 2/11/07, Wendy Smoak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 2/11/07, Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yes, both the Spring Plugin and Codebehind Plugin are missing from the
> assembly POM.
>
> Do we just want to
>
> (1) note this as a known issue,
> (2) branch on 2.0.5 and issue a 2.0.5.1 version of the lib and all
> distributions.
> (3) issue 2.0.6 from the 2.0.x branch.
>
> I could do any of these things today. If we do (3), I would first drop
> and recreate the 2.0.x tag from the 2.0.5 tag, so as to skip over the
> changes that broke the HEAD after 2.0.5 was tag. (Last time I branch
> the HEAD rather than a tag!)
My vote goes to (3) including re-branching 2.0.x from the 2.0.5 tag.
> Another build issue is that the TLD is being rewritten during the
> assembly, I guess to reflect changes to the annotations. Should we be
> running an assembly before the tag first, to look for TLD updates, and
> checking those in, before continuing with the rest of the tag and
> roll?
I'm not familiar enough with this to comment. Does this mean we're
checking a generated file into svn?
--
Wendy
On 2/11/07, Tom Schneider <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I vote for creation of a 2.0.x branch. There's several issues from
webwork that haven't been applied to the 2.0.x series and I'm sure there
will be more that will need to be carried forward.
Tom
On 2/11/07, Musachy Barroso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The TLD is always generated. It was removed at some point, but when we had
the problem with the annotations, it was added back until the problem would
be fixed, so it can be removed now.
musachy
On 2/11/07, Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On 2/11/07, Wendy Smoak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I'm not familiar enough with this to comment. Does this mean we're
> > checking a generated file into svn?
>
> My understanding is the annotations are generating the TLD. We checked
> the TLD when we were having problems with the generation, but I don't
> know if we want to keep it checked in or not.
>
> We also checkin the HTML docs for the tags, at
>
> * struts2/core/src/site/resources/tags
>
> I believe for the benefit of the snippet macro.
>
> -Ted.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
