In the case where we have a public beta, I wonder if we should make it
a practice to hold any subsequent quality vote on user@ rather than
[EMAIL PROTECTED] We could post a note to the initial quality vote, to be sure
everyone is in the loop, but holding the vote on user@ would give
other people who have tested the beta a chance to chime in.

Thoughts?

-Ted.

PS -- I'm still planning to roll Struts 2.0.6 later today.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to