On 2/15/07, Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
In the case where we have a public beta, I wonder if we should make it a practice to hold any subsequent quality vote on user@
Is purpose of this is to get more user feedback on the voting? Or is it so users see what's going on since the beta is public? I don't have a problem with it in concept as long as it continues to be made clear that only PMC votes are binding. Greg
