We talked about this at some length when the ActionContext was first introduced. We also talked about having the base action implement ActionCommand and/or some other options.
I think the only reason we didn't do it then was because it was still new, and we thought we'd let it settle in for a while. In fact, the idea you suggest may at one point have been on the roadmap for 1.4. Joe On 3/7/07, Paul Benedict <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Just gathering some opinions here... Would it be preferable to accept an ActionContext in execute() rather than the 4 parameters? public ActionForward execute(ActionContext context) throws Exception; Thanks, Paul --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-- Joe Germuska [EMAIL PROTECTED] * http://blog.germuska.com "The truth is that we learned from João forever to be out of tune." -- Caetano Veloso
