On 3/7/07, Joe Germuska <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
We talked about this at some length when the ActionContext was first introduced.
IIRC, "at some length" would be a bit of an understatement. ;-) I'm sure there are numerous lengthy threads on this subject in the list archives. -- Martin Cooper We also talked about having the base action implement
ActionCommand and/or some other options. I think the only reason we didn't do it then was because it was still new, and we thought we'd let it settle in for a while. In fact, the idea you suggest may at one point have been on the roadmap for 1.4. Joe On 3/7/07, Paul Benedict <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Just gathering some opinions here... > > Would it be preferable to accept an ActionContext in execute() rather > than the 4 parameters? > > public ActionForward execute(ActionContext context) throws Exception; > > Thanks, > Paul > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- Joe Germuska [EMAIL PROTECTED] * http://blog.germuska.com "The truth is that we learned from João forever to be out of tune." -- Caetano Veloso
