I had some time to look into splitting the code out of core and there's a lot more going on than I first thought. Right now I'm still getting back into s2, so either someone else run with it or it will have to wait a few weeks for me to get my head around it all.

Thanks


--
James Mitchell
The Ruby Roundup
http://www.rubyroundup.com/


On Mar 14, 2007, at 6:25 PM, James Mitchell wrote:

I don't understand. Why would the refactoring have to happen *before* any code was moved into a plugin?

Before vs after?  I don't get that part.


--
James Mitchell
The Ruby Roundup
http://www.rubyroundup.com/


On Mar 14, 2007, at 11:49 AM, Nils-Helge Garli wrote:

I was referring to some earlier mail threads, "[s2] Pluggable URL
building proposal
(http://www.mail-archive.com/dev@struts.apache.org/msg26942.html)" and
"[S2] Experimental Features"
(http://www.mail-archive.com/dev@struts.apache.org/msg26342.html)
where some issues were discussed that need to be resolved before the
portlet code can be extracted from the core.

On 3/14/07, James Mitchell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
What do you mean?  I haven't changed any code yet, and the portlet
sample app runs fine.  What code should be refactored and why?


--
James Mitchell
The Ruby Roundup
http://www.rubyroundup.com/


On Mar 14, 2007, at 3:02 AM, Nils-Helge Garli wrote:

> As long as the URL building has been refactored, or will be refactored > at the same time, as discussed earlier, there shouldn't be anything
> stopping from extracting it as a plugin.
>
> Nils-H
>
> On 3/14/07, James Mitchell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Ok, I took the portlet app and added some pluto maven magic and
>> deployed it to pluto 1.1.0...works fine.
>>
>> Now, I'd like to begin pulling the portlet code out into a plugin. >> It seems pretty straight forward, however, since I've not messed with >> the plugin architecture very much, are there any gotchas that I need
>> to know about?  Don?  Nils?
>>
>>
>> --
>> James Mitchell
>> The Ruby Roundup
>> http://www.rubyroundup.com/
>>
>>
>> On Mar 11, 2007, at 8:05 AM, Ted Husted wrote:
>>
>> > On 3/10/07, James Mitchell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >> That said, I would look at the portlet support, but I'm
>> probably the
>> >> least qualified to work on that.  If you still have no one to
>> >> volunteer, I can look at it next week.
>> >
>> > At this point, the next step is to migrate it to a plugin, as
>> Musachy
>> > has been doing with the AJjx/Dojo tags. Aside from testing that it >> > works the same, at least for starters, the real fun there would be
>> > playing with plugins :)
>> >
>> > -Ted.
>> >
>> >
>> -------------------------------------------------------------------- -
>> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> >
>>
>>
>> -------------------------------------------------------------------- -
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------- -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>


-------------------------------------------------------------------- -
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to