Licensing?

I don't want to encourage a situation where there's a
perception of "golden" plugins vs. everything else,
and I'd assume (perhaps incorrectly) that projects
hosted under the Apache umbrella would have to be
Apache-licensed.

d.

--- "Frank W. Zammetti" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> I was involved with the Sourceforge project Ted
> mentioned, as well as
> having a couple of S2 plugins in the registry now...
> my question, which I
> had for the Sourceforge project too, was why not
> host this at Apache and
> have it under Struts itself?  If we're talking about
> CLAs for GC
> contributions now too, I'm not sure I see the
> difference.  If it's a
> question of perception, i.e., if it's external than
> no plugin is
> officially endorsed or anything, that seems to run
> contrary to listing
> developers and all that's being talked about here. 
> I can't imagine
> there's infrastructure issues that couldn't be dealt
> with.
> 
> Why wouldn't/couldn't/shouldn't/*dn't this be put
> officially under the
> Struts umbrella and hosted alongside Struts itself?
> 
> Frank
> 
> -- 
> Frank W. Zammetti
> Founder and Chief Software Architect
> Omnytex Technologies
> http://www.omnytex.com
> AIM/Yahoo: fzammetti
> MSN: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Author of "Practical Ajax Projects With Java
> Technology"
>  (2006, Apress, ISBN 1-59059-695-1)
> and "JavaScript, DOM Scripting and Ajax Projects"
>  (2007, Apress, ISBN 1-59059-816-4)
> Java Web Parts - http://javawebparts.sourceforge.net
>  Supplying the wheel, so you don't have to reinvent
> it!
> 
> On Tue, November 27, 2007 8:48 am, Tom Schneider
> wrote:
> > I think having separate googlecode projects for
> each plugin has worked
> > well up to this point.  Creating a googlecode
> project is quick and
> > easy.  Googlecode seems to be designed to have a
> lot of really small
> > projects, rather than one big projects with many
> subprojects.  The one
> > thing that ties everything together is the plugin
> registry.  If
> > anything, I'd rather see that expanded.  Maybe add
> a list of developers
> > to the plugin registry.  I think the apache
> developers would feel more
> > obligated to maintain something hosted on Apache
> as opposed to something
> > hosted on googlecode.  As you may be able to tell,
> not a lot of the
> > googlecode plugin sites have a ton of content. 
> The only reason I
> > created a common maven repository is so that end
> users only have to add
> > one plugin repository to get access to most of the
> plugins.
> >
> > Ted Husted wrote:
> >> Very cool, Tom.
> >>
> >> Has anyone started a shared GoogleCode project
> for Struts 2 plugins yet?
> >>
> >> The notion being that instead of everyone
> starting up one-off
> >> projects, we could have one GC project that
> anyone with a Google ID
> >> could join and use to maintain a "third-party"
> Struts 2 plugin -- a
> >> Struts 2 Plugin Commons.
> >>
> >> Of course, the group could still have a select
> group of owners that
> >> could remove someone who joined and then turned
> out to be a troll.
> >>
> >> -Ted.
> >>
> >> On Nov 25, 2007 10:12 AM, Tom Schneider
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Hey all,
> >>> I finally figured out a way to host a maven
> repository on googlecode.
> >>> This should greatly simplify using googlecode
> hosted plugins in Struts
> >>> 2.  For me, it's also much nicer to use maven to
> deploy than trying to
> >>> get a jar manually uploaded into the central
> repository.  Instructions
> >>> on how to use this repo for Struts 2 projects
> are at:
> >>>
> http://code.google.com/p/struts2plugin-maven-repo/
> >>>
> >>> Anyone who has a plugin hosted at googlecode can
> use this maven
> >>> repository to host their plugin.  (I've already
> added several
> >>> developers
> >>> that I know of, if your not in the list let me
> know)  I've also already
> >>> added several of my more popular plugins.  I
> plan on adding the rest as
> >>> time permits.  Please look at the scope plugin
> (on googlecode) for an
> >>> example of how to configure maven to deploy to
> this repository.
> >>> Tom
> >>>
> >>
> >>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> For additional commands, e-mail:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> >
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > For additional commands, e-mail:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >
> 
> 
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> 


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to