Sorry about my last message. I wasn't sure if your response was directed to Chris or myself.
newton.dave wrote: > > --- "matt.payne" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Chris Pratt wrote: >> > On Jan 10, 2008 1:15 PM, matt.payne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> It would be a ton more useful if it could provide the default class >> for >> >> actions defined in a abstract parent package, where the implementation >> >> class for those actions was not specified. >> > I'm not sure what you mean by the "abstract parent package", otherwise >> > that seems like exactly what it does. If you create a package in >> > struts.xml and define the default-class-ref, then create another >> > package that extends the first, it should inherit the >> > default-class-ref from the parent package. >> My expectation would be that child package would override >> "default-class-ref" and have that applied/substituted to the actions >> defined in the parent. > > Isn't that sort of backwards to how inheritance works? A child package > defines behavior for it and its children, not its parents. > > d. > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/http%3A--struts.apache.org-dtds-struts-2.0.dtd-needs-to-be-updated-tp14742352p14794892.html Sent from the Struts - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
