I created the Jira issue for xwork. http://jira.opensymphony.com/browse/XW-603
Ted Husted wrote: > > On Jan 13, 2008 10:34 PM, matt.payne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> No not backwards at all. It is exactly how inheritance works. A child >> is >> free to override in case it wants to provide its own implementation of >> something. > > It's how configuration works, when there "can be only one" > configuration setting. But it is not how inheritance works in > languages like Java. > > In the case of this particular setting, I would say that each package > should be allowed its own copy of the setting, and that if we change > the setting for a child, then only its children inherit the setting. > > -Ted. > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/http%3A--struts.apache.org-dtds-struts-2.0.dtd-needs-to-be-updated-tp14742352p14845312.html Sent from the Struts - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
