I don't think we should wait at all. Refactoring dojo out of core was one of the main things for 2.1 and it's been there for a year already. Unless Dojo 1.0 is a lot, way, way better than the older versions, I would say you will find lots of surprises. IMO you should set it up as a project on googlecode or somewhere else and we can all contribute/test and eventually bring it on (or just keep it there and get rid of our current plugin).
my 2 centavos :) musachy On Sat, Apr 5, 2008 at 6:19 PM, Dave Newton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > --- Al Sutton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Whilst I can see that there is an advantage to getting a 2.1 release out, > > my question would be do we want it to go out with a (very) old version > > of dojo as the demonstration of it's modern ajax capabilities?, and do > > we want to put developers through getting used to 0.4 as the bundled > > version and then jump to a much newer version as a minor version release? > > So the questions are how well tested are the new Dojo tags, and if they're > not tested well enough how long would it take to test them? Lastly, how much > rework, if any, is required to match the functionality of the 0.4x plugin? > > My impression is still that Dojo 1.0 is pretty different from Dojo 0.4x, and > that this is a non-trivial project--but that's a guess made from ignorance. > Is there any evidence to the contrary? Have the tags been tested (even > manually) on the client side to bulk-verify behavior? > > Due to some immediate responsibilities, my availability for working on a Dojo > 1.0 plugin is limited and conditional: > > -- I have some time I can dedicate to *testing* new Dojo tags. > -- I don't have the time to learn Dojo 1.0 well and implement much changed > and/or new functionality if both the cost and risk are high. > -- The window within that time is available is short, and dwindling. > -- The more people working on it the more likely I am to make the time > because of a perceived lower risk. > > Nutshell: what's anybody's take on the effort this would require, and who's > available to make that effort? > > Dave > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- "Hey you! Would you help me to carry the stone?" Pink Floyd --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
