> Don's point is a valid one, but I also hope that he agrees that its a good > thing to somehow combine REST and Convention. I am not so sure that > changing how Struts fundamentally works so that we can include more and > competing plugins at runtime is a good thing. It is that type of confusion > that makes the framework hard for the masses to absorb. >
I agree if you are talking in general, but in this case I think it is an improvement if anything. If you add 2 plugins that handle different url patterns and they both define UnknownHandler(s), even when at runtime they should co-exist peacefully, you will get an exception when the xmls are loaded. I think this is a bug in the framework, and we are seeing its effects on the Codbehind vs Convention collision problem. musachy -- "Hey you! Would you help me to carry the stone?" Pink Floyd --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
