On Sunday 26 April 2009 07:47:25 pm Martin Cooper wrote: > > There's no requirement to serialise votes and releases the way you describe > above. In fact, as Wendy pointed out before, we could actually run the > votes concurrently. I'd say there's very little chance that the POM vote > would fail, so there would be little risk to that approach. > > Also, even if we went ahead and released the POM now, we could still > release it again immediately after Lukasz's account is set up. No need to > wait until we're close to another release. > > I'm not advocating any particular approach here - just clarifying the > options. >
I didn't realize we could run them concurrently... I originally planned to do the build/release tomorrow. I'll just plan to do them both then, if he's in, great, otherwise, we'll run a release of struts- master when he's in. I can put him in the pom.xml before running the release, I can't find the email where he indicated his choices for username. If someone can forward me what his first choice was, I don't think there are any lukasz's on apache namespace, so I'm thinking his first choice will go through. -Wes PS - HAHAHAHA! Just before I hit send, the NOTICE email came through... -- Wes Wannemacher Author - Struts 2 In Practice Includes coverage of Struts 2.1, Spring, JPA, JQuery, Sitemesh and more http://www.manning.com/wannemacher --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@struts.apache.org
