On Sun, Apr 26, 2009 at 4:53 PM, Wes Wannemacher <w...@wantii.com> wrote:
> On Sunday 26 April 2009 07:47:25 pm Martin Cooper wrote: > > > > There's no requirement to serialise votes and releases the way you > describe > > above. In fact, as Wendy pointed out before, we could actually run the > > votes concurrently. I'd say there's very little chance that the POM vote > > would fail, so there would be little risk to that approach. > > > > Also, even if we went ahead and released the POM now, we could still > > release it again immediately after Lukasz's account is set up. No need to > > wait until we're close to another release. > > > > I'm not advocating any particular approach here - just clarifying the > > options. > > > > I didn't realize we could run them concurrently... > > I originally planned to do the build/release tomorrow. I'll just plan to do > them both then, if he's in, great, otherwise, we'll run a release of > struts- > master when he's in. I can put him in the pom.xml before running the > release, > I can't find the email where he indicated his choices for username. If > someone > can forward me what his first choice was, I don't think there are any > lukasz's > on apache namespace, so I'm thinking his first choice will go through. > > -Wes > > PS - HAHAHAHA! Just before I hit send, the NOTICE email came through... Yup. I've taken care of the Struts-related bits, so he's good to go. -- Martin Cooper > > -- > > Wes Wannemacher > Author - Struts 2 In Practice > Includes coverage of Struts 2.1, Spring, JPA, JQuery, Sitemesh and more > http://www.manning.com/wannemacher > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@struts.apache.org > >
