Wendy, Your logic about repacking everything or nothing makes sense. Agreed.
Lastly, unless there needs to be changes within SVN (like correcting Maven configuration to fix the build), I see no reason for a new release. Were there commits to fix something? If so, that satisfies me. Otherwise, it's totally unnecessary if the build was wonky because of a committer's command-line. Paul On Thu, Oct 1, 2009 at 4:28 PM, Wendy Smoak <wsm...@gmail.com> wrote: > "The whole release" would be both the distribution zips and the Maven > artifacts. If we're going to retract the release, we should retract > *all* of it. I'm not in favor of that since the code is fine, we just > have a packaging problem with the documentation. > > As I understand the proposed solution, we're not going to change > anything about 2.1.8, but instead do a full 2.1.8.1 (distribution zips > and Maven artifacts) to correct the problem. > > I'm okay with that, but would not rush the release vote since it needs > more testing, not less... > > -- > Wendy > > On Thu, Oct 1, 2009 at 1:18 PM, Paul Benedict <pbened...@apache.org> wrote: >> Wendy, I did say in a later email I wrongly believed we were talking >> about Maven repos. If it is just the Apache distributions, and those >> have bogus files, those should be deleted. Just can the whole release. >> I think that's sensible. >> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@struts.apache.org > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@struts.apache.org
