Then what was the point of getting the IP for XWork? On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 5:30 PM, Brian Pontarelli <br...@pontarelli.com> wrote: > JSR 299 is EE while 330 is SE. > > -bp > > > On Dec 8, 2009, at 4:12 PM, Paul Benedict wrote: > >> I've been loosely following the thread. It sounds like three DI >> projects are being/will be supported: >> * XWork >> * Guice >> * JSR-299/JSR-330 >> >> Why three? I can understand the last because it's EE, but the other >> two are proprietary. >> >> Paul >> >> On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 4:08 PM, Lukasz Lenart >> <lukasz.len...@googlemail.com> wrote: >>> In my opinion, current DI support is sufficient (it can be made more >>> readable, but that's it ;-), I really don't get it what's the problem with >>> double ObjectFactory issue??? >>> >>> >>> Regards >>> -- >>> Lukasz >>> http://www.lenart.org.pl/ >>> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@struts.apache.org >> > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@struts.apache.org > >
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@struts.apache.org
