Why not RCn?
Dave On Feb 17, 2011 10:02 AM, "Lukasz Lenart" <lukasz.len...@googlemail.com> wrote: > 2011/2/17 Wendy Smoak <wsm...@gmail.com>: >> As release manager you can frame the vote however you want. If you >> have specific reasons for calling it a Beta release (unfinished >> feature, API not yet locked down,) then you can mention them. It's >> unlikely the rest of the dev team will revolt and insist on labeling >> it GA. ;) > > OK, thanks :-) > >> The convention here (decided long ago) is to use "plain" numbered >> versions like 2.3.4 and apply a quality label to them later. It's not >> clear whether you want to change that, but if so I'd suggest digging >> back through the archives to understand why it was done and then >> starting a separate thread to discuss. > > The answer is simple: I'm using Maven for development basis and it's > easy for me to switch between versions. I don't need to go to a web > page to check if 2.2.2 is a Beta or GA. I see it just in my pom. > > > Kind regards > -- > Łukasz > + 48 606 323 122 http://www.lenart.org.pl/ > Kapituła Javarsovia http://javarsovia.pl > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@struts.apache.org >
