Maurizio

One more thing, the docs aren't accurate, you have to download the
assemblies from Nexus, not to use created / uploaded by you as they
miss control sums. I've been using the script below to do that:

#!/bin/bash

for f in struts*.*
do
  rm $f
done

wget -erobots=off -nv -i -E -l 1 --accept=zip,md5,sha1,asc -r
--no-check-certificate -nd -nH
https://repository.apache.org/content/groups/public/org/apache/struts/struts2-assembly/$VERSION

for f in *2-assembly*.zip*
do
  mv $f `echo $f | sed s/2-assembly//g`
done

for f in struts2-assembly-*.pom*
do
  rm $f
done


Kind regards
-- 
Łukasz
+ 48 606 323 122 http://www.lenart.org.pl/
Warszawa JUG conference - Confitura http://confitura.pl/

2011/9/5 Maurizio Cucchiara <maurizio.cucchi...@gmail.com>:
> Hi René,
> it makes a lot of sense to me. So if there is no objections, I would rename
> the 2.2.3.1 branch to 2.2.3.x.
> In this way, it makes also sense to allow the maven release plugin to
> increment the version in order to prepare for next development iteration.
>
> Thank you for your suggestion.
> Maurizio Cucchiara
>
>
> On 5 September 2011 16:40, Rene Gielen <rene.gie...@googlemail.com> wrote:
>
>> Maurizio,
>>
>> great, thanks for jumping in! You've earned your Release Manager Badge
>> the hard way, as it is mostly always for the first time :)
>>
>> While reading your posts and checking [1] I stumbled upon the branch
>> name to use.
>>
>> Actually we should adjust "When a serious security issue arises, we
>> should try to create a #.#.#.1 branch from the last GA release, and
>> apply to that branch only the security patch." - the branch to create
>> would be "2.2.3.x" and not "2.2.3.1" - the latter one will be the tag
>> for the version to release. If we would have to roll out another patch
>> release, the patch would be applied against 2.2.3.x branch and the
>> tagged as 2.2.3.2. So I'd suggest to exchange the cited "#.#.#.1" with
>> "#.#.#.x".
>>
>> Does this make sense to you guys?
>>
>> - René
>>
>> [1]
>>
>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/WW/Creating+and+Signing+a+Struts+2.2.x+Distribution#CreatingandSigningaStruts2.2.xDistribution-FastTrackinganImportantSecurityRelease
>>
>> Am 05.09.11 17:58, schrieb Maurizio Cucchiara:
>> > It looks like it works now, thank you Lukasz.
>> >
>> > Maurizio Cucchiara
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > 2011/9/5 Łukasz Lenart <lukasz.len...@googlemail.com>:
>> >> I've messed up everything, I was thinking about JIRA but checked on
>> >> Confluence :/
>> >>
>> >> Anyway, please check now.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> Kind regards
>> >> --
>> >> Łukasz
>> >> + 48 606 323 122 http://www.lenart.org.pl/
>> >> Warszawa JUG conference - Confitura http://confitura.pl/
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> 2011/9/5 Maurizio Cucchiara <mcucchi...@apache.org>:
>> >>> Hi Lukasz,
>> >>> I don't know if it will help, but looking at JIRA I realized  that on
>> >>> the OGNL project (so would you) I have the admin rights which we are
>> >>> talking about.
>> >>> Maurizio Cucchiara
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> 2011/9/5 Łukasz Lenart <lukasz.len...@googlemail.com>:
>> >>>> I've asked INFRA if they can create such a group -
>> struts-release-manager
>> >>>> I have rights to do it, but I don't know how :/
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Kind regards
>> >>>> --
>> >>>> Łukasz
>> >>>> + 48 606 323 122 http://www.lenart.org.pl/
>> >>>> Warszawa JUG conference - Confitura http://confitura.pl/
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>> 2011/9/5 Maurizio Cucchiara <mcucchi...@apache.org>:
>> >>>>> Hi Wendy,
>> >>>>> I was talking about the 6,7,8 steps listed on http://s.apache.org/hb
>> >>>>> and generally everything related to JIIRA, since I have no JIIRA
>> admin
>> >>>>> rights.
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> Maurizio Cucchiara
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> On 5 September 2011 01:59, Wendy Smoak <wsm...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >>>>>> On Sun, Sep 4, 2011 at 4:17 PM, Maurizio Cucchiara
>> >>>>>> <mcucchi...@apache.org> wrote:
>> >>>>>>> Lukasz,
>> >>>>>>> I am afraid I am not able to perform the 6,7,8  tasks illustrated
>> on
>> >>>>>>> http://s.apache.org/rel, since I have no enough karma.
>> >>>>>> Which steps do you mean?  Any committer should be able to stage a
>> >>>>>> release and call a vote.
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> (There is a 'versions' plugin that can make the version number
>> >>>>>> changes, though if you're good at regular expressions your way was
>> >>>>>> probably quicker. :) )
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> --
>> >>>>>> Wendy
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> >>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org
>> >>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@struts.apache.org
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> >>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org
>> >>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@struts.apache.org
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>
>> >>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> >>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org
>> >>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@struts.apache.org
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org
>> >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@struts.apache.org
>> >>
>> >>
>> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org
>> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@struts.apache.org
>> >
>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@struts.apache.org
>>
>>
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@struts.apache.org

Reply via email to