It's a good thought, but if you do that, then there's no incremental migration path between S2 and S3.
On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 10:02 AM, Lukasz Lenart <[email protected]>wrote: > 2013/3/19 Paul Benedict <[email protected]>: > > If we name the Java package "org.apache.struts3", we will keep a > migration > > path open for *both* S1 and S2. The perspective we should have, I think, > is > > that we are one of many front-end technologies and it's *necessary* for > > multiple versions of Struts to be used at the same time. Even if it is > not > > necessary for small projects, it makes adopting Struts 3 easier in large > > organizations because we are allowing incremental migration. > > I rather thought about leaving o.a.struts2 as is, just cut out what is > deprecated and old. > > > Regards > -- > Łukasz > + 48 606 323 122 http://www.lenart.org.pl/ > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > >
