Ah, well, the only unfortunate problem with calling it 2.5 is that you already have a 2.3. No one is going to realize you intend it as a half-jump release (like Tomcat 5.0 and 5.5). There will likely be confusion why a point release dropped so much support, but if we advertise in big bold letters that 2.5 is not backwards compatible, then perhaps the numbering is acceptable.
Paul On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 4:36 PM, Lukasz Lenart <[email protected]>wrote: > 2013/3/19 Paul Benedict <[email protected]>: > > Don't you think it will raise questions (and eyebrows) why Struts 3 has a > > struts 2 package name? > > That's why we should call it S2.5, in other words when package name > remains unchanged it shouldn't be called S3 ;) > > > Regards > -- > Łukasz > + 48 606 323 122 http://www.lenart.org.pl/ > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > >
