2013/9/12 Dale Newfield <d...@newfield.org>: > On Sep 12, 2013, at 11:34 AM, Ken McWilliams <ken.mcwilli...@gmail.com> wrote: >> prefix, IE: "OGNL:" or "EL: > > I've long argued that %{}, #{}, ${} provides this already, and that this > wrapping should therefore not be optional in preparation for when something > other than %{} might be functional.
Easy you horses ... it's a complicated task ;-) First I'd like to have other implementation working, thus should eliminate some internal bugs (like additional conversion from parser - parser did that already :-)) and internal dependencies. Next I want to change behaviour of all tags - there be no automatic expression evaluation at all - you must directly use ${}, %{}, #{} to do that - thus will eliminate users' frustration when to use $,%,# and when don't. Regards -- Ćukasz + 48 606 323 122 http://www.lenart.org.pl/ --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@struts.apache.org