I have started updating the site, right now moved the whole /dev to Markdown and moved files to root folder. Please check if everything is ok - WIP!
http://struts.staging.apache.org/ 2014/1/21 Lukasz Lenart <lukaszlen...@apache.org>: > I don't see objections so I think we can start with that :-) > > 2014/1/9 Lukasz Lenart <lukaszlen...@apache.org>: >> Infra doesn't have time to answer my questions [1] and it's a bit >> annoying to wait with everything for them. So to not be dependent on >> Infra I think we should move / create a user guide under website and >> left Confluence / Wiki as a reference with more detailed informations. >> Then the release process will only export the user guide which will be >> included in packages. >> >> And to move things forward the best will be if we convert >> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/WW/Getting+Started into >> the user guide. >> >> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-6350 >> >> >> Regards >> -- >> Łukasz >> + 48 606 323 122 http://www.lenart.org.pl/ >> >> 2013/12/16 Paul Benedict <pbened...@apache.org>: >>> Years in the making. WOW! The Wiki documentation finally looks readable! >>> >>> >>> On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 3:33 PM, Lukasz Lenart >>> <lukaszlen...@apache.org>wrote: >>> >>>> I have removed custom css, the space looks better now :-) >>>> >>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/WW/Home >>>> >>>> >>>> Regards >>>> -- >>>> Łukasz >>>> + 48 606 323 122 http://www.lenart.org.pl/ >>>> >>>> 2013/12/16 Lukasz Lenart <lukaszlen...@apache.org>: >>>> > FYI >>>> > >>>> > Confluence was upgraded to version 5 and there are some problems with >>>> > editing pages. >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > Regards >>>> > -- >>>> > Łukasz >>>> > + 48 606 323 122 http://www.lenart.org.pl/ >>>> > >>>> > 2013/12/11 Lukasz Lenart <lukaszlen...@apache.org>: >>>> >> One more thing: everything editable will be moved to struts-site (i.e. >>>> >> the new plugin.md) to don't mess with things generated by Maven >>>> >> >>>> >> So the project source code will contain only source code and JavaDocs, >>>> >> the rest will be outside it. >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> >> Regards >>>> >> -- >>>> >> Łukasz >>>> >> + 48 606 323 122 http://www.lenart.org.pl/ >>>> >> >>>> >> 2013/12/11 Paul Benedict <pbened...@apache.org>: >>>> >>> Sounds good to me. The easier the better. >>>> >>> >>>> >>> >>>> >>> On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 2:06 AM, Lukasz Lenart < >>>> lukaszlen...@apache.org>wrote: >>>> >>> >>>> >>>> Still thinking how to organise everything, maybe instead common >>>> >>>> /release/2.3.x and so on it'd be better to have something like that: >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> /docs/latest -> latest development version >>>> >>>> /docs/2.3.x >>>> >>>> /docs/2.2.x >>>> >>>> ... >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> and >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> /apidocs/latest -> the same as above >>>> >>>> /apidocs/2.3.x >>>> >>>> /apidocs/2.2.x >>>> >>>> ... >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> there be no more dedicated S2 subsite, everything will be put on the >>>> >>>> top, also Maven reports will be thrown away. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Regards >>>> >>>> -- >>>> >>>> Łukasz >>>> >>>> + 48 606 323 122 http://www.lenart.org.pl/ >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> 2013/12/10 Lukasz Lenart <lukaszlen...@apache.org>: >>>> >>>> > Starting work on that - it must be resolved before next release >>>> comes >>>> >>>> out. >>>> >>>> > >>>> >>>> > My plan is to have two tasks: >>>> >>>> > 1. it will export pages from Confluence and will put them under >>>> /docs >>>> >>>> > 2. used after release to update JavaDocs (regenerate from tag) and >>>> >>>> > Docs (copy from /docs to /release/2.3.x/docs) >>>> >>>> > >>>> >>>> > WDYT? >>>> >>>> > >>>> >>>> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-6350 >>>> >>>> > >>>> >>>> > >>>> >>>> > Regards >>>> >>>> > -- >>>> >>>> > Łukasz >>>> >>>> > + 48 606 323 122 http://www.lenart.org.pl/ >>>> >>>> > >>>> >>>> > 2013/11/6 Lukasz Lenart <lukaszlen...@apache.org>: >>>> >>>> >> 2013/11/5 Paul Benedict <pbened...@apache.org>: >>>> >>>> >>> I usually find it a life-saver to see the docs of previous >>>> versions. >>>> >>>> Not >>>> >>>> >>> everyone upgrades and it's impossible to compare latest syntax and >>>> >>>> features >>>> >>>> >>> to what was before. I think we definitely need to keep the docs >>>> of the >>>> >>>> >>> previously published versions around. >>>> >>>> >> >>>> >>>> >> But you meant to have the Draft docs and the latest released >>>> version? >>>> >>>> >> Or as it is now, version per branch (2.3, 2.2, 2.1, etc) ? >>>> >>>> >> >>>> >>>> >>> If you don't want to do that, then I think the latest docs need to >>>> >>>> contain >>>> >>>> >>> some sort of history on feature changes/upgrades. >>>> >>>> >> >>>> >>>> >> Hm... I think it's easier to keep few versions ;-) >>>> >>>> >> >>>> >>>> >> >>>> >>>> >> Regards >>>> >>>> >> -- >>>> >>>> >> Łukasz >>>> >>>> >> + 48 606 323 122 http://www.lenart.org.pl/ >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>> >>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org >>>> >>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@struts.apache.org >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>>> >>> >>>> >>> -- >>>> >>> Cheers, >>>> >>> Paul >>>> >>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org >>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@struts.apache.org >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Cheers, >>> Paul --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@struts.apache.org
