I assume no objections and I can switch the branch. 2014-02-09 22:21 GMT+01:00 Lukasz Lenart <lukaszlen...@apache.org>: > Ok, done! All pages migrated, outdated removed, etc. > > http://people.apache.org/~lukaszlenart/ > > To build site locally (install Jekyll first): > - svn co http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/struts/site/branches/jekyll-powered/ > struts-site > - cd struts-site > - jekyll serve > - open http://localhost:4000/ > > If no objections I'd like switch to Jekyll ASAP (I'm going to wait 72h > to satisfy silent consensus) > > > Regards > -- > Łukasz > + 48 606 323 122 http://www.lenart.org.pl/ > > 2014-02-09 9:49 GMT+01:00 Lukasz Lenart <lukaszlen...@apache.org>: >> First draft :-) >> >> http://people.apache.org/~lukaszlenart/ >> >> Jekyll, jQuery 1.11.0, Bootstrap 3.1 >> >> >> Regards >> -- >> Łukasz >> + 48 606 323 122 http://www.lenart.org.pl/ >> >> 2014-02-08 10:35 GMT+01:00 Lukasz Lenart <lukaszlen...@apache.org>: >>> Another thing - I have started site migration to Jekyll on dedicated branch >>> >>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/struts/site/branches/jekyll-powered/ >>> >>> 2014-01-22 11:35 GMT+01:00 Lukasz Lenart <lukaszlen...@apache.org>: >>>> I have started updating the site, right now moved the whole /dev to >>>> Markdown and moved files to root folder. Please check if everything is >>>> ok - WIP! >>>> >>>> http://struts.staging.apache.org/ >>>> >>>> 2014/1/21 Lukasz Lenart <lukaszlen...@apache.org>: >>>>> I don't see objections so I think we can start with that :-) >>>>> >>>>> 2014/1/9 Lukasz Lenart <lukaszlen...@apache.org>: >>>>>> Infra doesn't have time to answer my questions [1] and it's a bit >>>>>> annoying to wait with everything for them. So to not be dependent on >>>>>> Infra I think we should move / create a user guide under website and >>>>>> left Confluence / Wiki as a reference with more detailed informations. >>>>>> Then the release process will only export the user guide which will be >>>>>> included in packages. >>>>>> >>>>>> And to move things forward the best will be if we convert >>>>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/WW/Getting+Started into >>>>>> the user guide. >>>>>> >>>>>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-6350 >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Regards >>>>>> -- >>>>>> Łukasz >>>>>> + 48 606 323 122 http://www.lenart.org.pl/ >>>>>> >>>>>> 2013/12/16 Paul Benedict <pbened...@apache.org>: >>>>>>> Years in the making. WOW! The Wiki documentation finally looks readable! >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 3:33 PM, Lukasz Lenart >>>>>>> <lukaszlen...@apache.org>wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I have removed custom css, the space looks better now :-) >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/WW/Home >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Regards >>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>> Łukasz >>>>>>>> + 48 606 323 122 http://www.lenart.org.pl/ >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> 2013/12/16 Lukasz Lenart <lukaszlen...@apache.org>: >>>>>>>> > FYI >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > Confluence was upgraded to version 5 and there are some problems with >>>>>>>> > editing pages. >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > Regards >>>>>>>> > -- >>>>>>>> > Łukasz >>>>>>>> > + 48 606 323 122 http://www.lenart.org.pl/ >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > 2013/12/11 Lukasz Lenart <lukaszlen...@apache.org>: >>>>>>>> >> One more thing: everything editable will be moved to struts-site >>>>>>>> >> (i.e. >>>>>>>> >> the new plugin.md) to don't mess with things generated by Maven >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> >> So the project source code will contain only source code and >>>>>>>> >> JavaDocs, >>>>>>>> >> the rest will be outside it. >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> >> Regards >>>>>>>> >> -- >>>>>>>> >> Łukasz >>>>>>>> >> + 48 606 323 122 http://www.lenart.org.pl/ >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> >> 2013/12/11 Paul Benedict <pbened...@apache.org>: >>>>>>>> >>> Sounds good to me. The easier the better. >>>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>>> >>> On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 2:06 AM, Lukasz Lenart < >>>>>>>> lukaszlen...@apache.org>wrote: >>>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>>> >>>> Still thinking how to organise everything, maybe instead common >>>>>>>> >>>> /release/2.3.x and so on it'd be better to have something like >>>>>>>> >>>> that: >>>>>>>> >>>> >>>>>>>> >>>> /docs/latest -> latest development version >>>>>>>> >>>> /docs/2.3.x >>>>>>>> >>>> /docs/2.2.x >>>>>>>> >>>> ... >>>>>>>> >>>> >>>>>>>> >>>> and >>>>>>>> >>>> >>>>>>>> >>>> /apidocs/latest -> the same as above >>>>>>>> >>>> /apidocs/2.3.x >>>>>>>> >>>> /apidocs/2.2.x >>>>>>>> >>>> ... >>>>>>>> >>>> >>>>>>>> >>>> there be no more dedicated S2 subsite, everything will be put on >>>>>>>> >>>> the >>>>>>>> >>>> top, also Maven reports will be thrown away. >>>>>>>> >>>> >>>>>>>> >>>> >>>>>>>> >>>> Regards >>>>>>>> >>>> -- >>>>>>>> >>>> Łukasz >>>>>>>> >>>> + 48 606 323 122 http://www.lenart.org.pl/ >>>>>>>> >>>> >>>>>>>> >>>> 2013/12/10 Lukasz Lenart <lukaszlen...@apache.org>: >>>>>>>> >>>> > Starting work on that - it must be resolved before next release >>>>>>>> comes >>>>>>>> >>>> out. >>>>>>>> >>>> > >>>>>>>> >>>> > My plan is to have two tasks: >>>>>>>> >>>> > 1. it will export pages from Confluence and will put them under >>>>>>>> /docs >>>>>>>> >>>> > 2. used after release to update JavaDocs (regenerate from tag) >>>>>>>> >>>> > and >>>>>>>> >>>> > Docs (copy from /docs to /release/2.3.x/docs) >>>>>>>> >>>> > >>>>>>>> >>>> > WDYT? >>>>>>>> >>>> > >>>>>>>> >>>> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-6350 >>>>>>>> >>>> > >>>>>>>> >>>> > >>>>>>>> >>>> > Regards >>>>>>>> >>>> > -- >>>>>>>> >>>> > Łukasz >>>>>>>> >>>> > + 48 606 323 122 http://www.lenart.org.pl/ >>>>>>>> >>>> > >>>>>>>> >>>> > 2013/11/6 Lukasz Lenart <lukaszlen...@apache.org>: >>>>>>>> >>>> >> 2013/11/5 Paul Benedict <pbened...@apache.org>: >>>>>>>> >>>> >>> I usually find it a life-saver to see the docs of previous >>>>>>>> versions. >>>>>>>> >>>> Not >>>>>>>> >>>> >>> everyone upgrades and it's impossible to compare latest >>>>>>>> >>>> >>> syntax and >>>>>>>> >>>> features >>>>>>>> >>>> >>> to what was before. I think we definitely need to keep the >>>>>>>> >>>> >>> docs >>>>>>>> of the >>>>>>>> >>>> >>> previously published versions around. >>>>>>>> >>>> >> >>>>>>>> >>>> >> But you meant to have the Draft docs and the latest released >>>>>>>> version? >>>>>>>> >>>> >> Or as it is now, version per branch (2.3, 2.2, 2.1, etc) ? >>>>>>>> >>>> >> >>>>>>>> >>>> >>> If you don't want to do that, then I think the latest docs >>>>>>>> >>>> >>> need to >>>>>>>> >>>> contain >>>>>>>> >>>> >>> some sort of history on feature changes/upgrades. >>>>>>>> >>>> >> >>>>>>>> >>>> >> Hm... I think it's easier to keep few versions ;-) >>>>>>>> >>>> >> >>>>>>>> >>>> >> >>>>>>>> >>>> >> Regards >>>>>>>> >>>> >> -- >>>>>>>> >>>> >> Łukasz >>>>>>>> >>>> >> + 48 606 323 122 http://www.lenart.org.pl/ >>>>>>>> >>>> >>>>>>>> >>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>>>> >>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org >>>>>>>> >>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@struts.apache.org >>>>>>>> >>>> >>>>>>>> >>>> >>>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>>> >>> -- >>>>>>>> >>> Cheers, >>>>>>>> >>> Paul >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org >>>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@struts.apache.org >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -- >>>>>>> Cheers, >>>>>>> Paul
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@struts.apache.org
