I would call it struts-legacy, already in struts1 such a project exists.

Regards

Ing. Michael Hintenaus
silbergrau Consulting & Software GmbH
http://www.silbergrau.com

> Am 18.09.2014 um 10:29 schrieb "Lukasz Lenart" <lukaszlen...@apache.org>:
> 
> Moving deprecated plugins to struts-extras project is just idea to
> give people option to contribute via GitHub - I know that know
> everyone can do the same, but I think people really don't understand
> that.
> 
> Or instead struts-extras it can be named struts-deprecated - anyway we
> won't throw it away but rather move into some project (ie.
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/struts/attic/)
> 
> 2014-09-17 16:25 GMT+02:00 Paul Benedict <pbened...@apache.org>:
> > If you move them into a separate module for 2.5, just don't include it in
> > the parent's build process (include it only as a special Maven profile).
> > It's someone is a die-hard hacker and wants to build it themselves, they
> > can.
> >
> > PS: When 3.0 comes around, I recommend we split off all plugins into
> > independent release cycles like Maven plugins. This way we can evolve and
> > deprecate them independently without waiting for core releases.
> >
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Paul
> >
> > On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 9:20 AM, Dave Newton <davelnew...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> I'm not excited about keeping the deprecated plugins around; IMO it implies
> >> support.
> >>
> >> People still ask questions about the Dojo plugin on Stack Overflow, running
> >> in S2.3. The plugin must die.
> >>
> >> On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 10:17 AM, Paul Benedict <pbened...@apache.org>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >> > Ah, struts-extras... how time comes full circle. Struts 1 had its extra
> >> > package too:
> >> > http://struts.apache.org/development/1.x/struts-extras/
> >> >
> >> > What does creating the new project buy us? or an end-user? Just curious.
> >> > Not criticizing; just wanting to learn your plan.
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > Cheers,
> >> > Paul
> >> >
> >> > On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 4:46 AM, Lukasz Lenart <lukaszlen...@apache.org>
> >> > wrote:
> >> >
> >> > > One more idea: instead of dropping deprecated plugins, move them into
> >> > > a new project ie. struts-extras, so the Struts project will consist
> >> > > of:
> >> > > - struts-framework
> >> > > - struts-examples
> >> > > - struts-apps
> >> > > - struts-archetypes
> >> > > - struts-extras
> >> > > - struts-website (on SVN)
> >> > >
> >> > > As far I can recall there was discussion about plugins, to also move
> >> > > them into dedicated project, but I'm still not sure if this is right
> >> > > or wrong
> >> > >
> >> > > 2014-04-05 13:11 GMT+02:00 Lukasz Lenart <lukaszlen...@apache.org>:
> >> > > > As I'm still working on releasing 2.3.17 I have started planning 2.5
> >> > > > and the rough plan is as follow:
> >> > > > - remove deprecated API
> >> > > > - remove deprecated plugins
> >> > > > - move apps to dedicated project
> >> > > > - move maven archetypes to dedicated project
> >> > > > - add safe and proper support for action: prefix
> >> > > > - add safe and proper support for "!" aka DMI
> >> > > >
> >> > > > any other ideas?
> >> > > >
> >> > > >
> >> > > > Regards
> >> > > > --
> >> > > > Ɓukasz
> >> > > > + 48 606 323 122 http://www.lenart.org.pl/
> >> > >
> >> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org
> >> > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@struts.apache.org
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> >
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> e: davelnew...@gmail.com
> >> m: 908-380-8699
> >> s: davelnewton_skype
> >> t: @dave_newton <https://twitter.com/dave_newton>
> >> b: Bucky Bits <http://buckybits.blogspot.com/>
> >> g: davelnewton <https://github.com/davelnewton>
> >> so: Dave Newton <http://stackoverflow.com/users/438992/dave-newton>
> >>
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@struts.apache.org
> 

Reply via email to