Yeah, I made similar murmurings the other day. In general, it seems we should favor the OSes for whom Subversion doesn't come via a semi-automated package management system.
Bert Huijben wrote: > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] >> Sent: maandag 25 januari 2010 23:57 >> To: [email protected] >> Subject: svn commit: r903006 - in /subversion/site/publish: getting.html >> packages.html >> >> Author: cmpilato >> Date: Mon Jan 25 22:57:07 2010 >> New Revision: 903006 >> >> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=903006&view=rev >> Log: >> Move binary package listing to their own page. >> >> * site/publish/packages.html >> Fork from "getting.html", heavily reformat, and add some JavaScript >> cuteness to allow quick jumps to packages. > > Maybe the Windows packages need a more prominent location instead of 5 pages > down on a more than average screensize. > I don't think the Aix packages which are the first on screen, come anything > near the number of downloads of the Windows binaries. > > The Apache 2.0 Windows binaries are only available for Subversion 1.5.X on > tigris.org, so that link could be a bit less prominent compared to the 2.2 > version or users are downloading a 1.5.6 version instead of 1.6.9. > > Bert > > -- C. Michael Pilato <[email protected]> CollabNet <> www.collab.net <> Distributed Development On Demand
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
