On Thu, Apr 1, 2010 at 8:52 AM, Paul Burba <[email protected]> wrote: > On Thu, Apr 1, 2010 at 8:08 AM, Paul Burba <[email protected]> wrote: >> On Thu, Apr 1, 2010 at 7:40 AM, Julian Foad <[email protected]> wrote: >>> On Thu, 2010-04-01 at 11:43 +0100, Julian Foad wrote: >>>> On Wed, 2010-03-31 at 13:01 -0600, Hyrum K. Wright wrote: >>>> > 1.6.10 tarballs are up, the magic revision is r929659: >>>> > >>>> > http://orac.ece.utexas.edu/pub/svn/1.6.10/ >>>> >>>> For me, merge_tests.py 45 77 79 124 126 all fail, on serf/fsfs. >>> >>> If I roll the 1.6.x branch back to r929629, it passes. >> >> Hi Julian, >> >> Doesn't really help you, but those all pass for me: >> >> C:\SVN\src-branch-1.6.x\Release\subversion\tests\cmdline>python >> C:\SVN\src-branch-1.6.x\subversion\tests\cmdline\merge_tests.py 45 77 >> 79 124 126 --http-library serf --cleanup >> PASS: merge_tests.py 45: target inherits mergeinfo from nearest ancestor >> PASS: merge_tests.py 77: subtrees added after start of merge range are ok >> PASS: merge_tests.py 79: merge --reintegrate with renamed file on branch >> PASS: merge_tests.py 124: no self referential filtering on added path >> PASS: merge_tests.py 126: merge --reintegrate with subtree mergeinfo > > My bad, I didn't pass --url! I was still half asleep when I did that. > The tests pass for me over ra_neon, but all except 77 fail over > ra_serf.
All 5 corresponding tests (45, 76, 78, 123, 125 for those playing at home) pass on trunk [fsfs | ra_serf] Paul
