On Thu, Apr 1, 2010 at 09:23, Julian Foad <[email protected]> wrote: > On Thu, 2010-04-01 at 08:52 -0400, Paul Burba wrote: >> On Thu, Apr 1, 2010 at 8:08 AM, Paul Burba <[email protected]> wrote: >> > On Thu, Apr 1, 2010 at 7:40 AM, Julian Foad <[email protected]> >> > wrote: >> >> On Thu, 2010-04-01 at 11:43 +0100, Julian Foad wrote: >> >>> On Wed, 2010-03-31 at 13:01 -0600, Hyrum K. Wright wrote: >> >>> > 1.6.10 tarballs are up, the magic revision is r929659: >> >>> > >> >>> > http://orac.ece.utexas.edu/pub/svn/1.6.10/ >> >>> >> >>> For me, merge_tests.py 45 77 79 124 126 all fail, on serf/fsfs. >> >> >> >> If I roll the 1.6.x branch back to r929629, it passes. > > D'oh, but trying again with r929629, running them individually, they all > fail except 77 which pass: > > [[[ > $ svn-py-test merge 45 77 79 124 126 --http-library=serf > --url=http://localhost:12843 --no-cleanup > [...] > FAIL: merge_tests.py 45: target inherits mergeinfo from nearest > ancestor > PASS: merge_tests.py 77: subtrees added after start of merge range are > ok > [...] > ]]] > > Don't know what's up with my testing to cause this discrepancy between > the full 'make davautocheck' and individual tests, and haven't yet > repeated them.
Make sure that your test environment has plenty of file handles available. I've seen spurious errors if the ulimit hasn't been increased before a test run. Cheers, -g
