On Thu, Apr 1, 2010 at 9:46 AM, Hyrum K. Wright < [email protected]> wrote:
> > > On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 4:58 PM, Joe Swatosh <[email protected]>wrote: > >> On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 1:29 PM, Hyrum K. Wright >> <[email protected]> wrote: >> > On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 1:01 PM, Hyrum K. Wright < >> > [email protected]> wrote: >> > >> >> 1.6.10 tarballs are up, the magic revision is r929659: >> >> >> >> http://orac.ece.utexas.edu/pub/svn/1.6.10/ >> >> >> >> Download, test, sign and send your sigs back to me. (And don't even >> think >> >> about declaring this as "released" until I say so, for reasons I won't >> >> expound upon here.) >> >> >> > >> > Update: Somebody (read: me) didn't run the bindings tests before rolling >> the >> > tarball. There are a few binding test failures, one in the ruby >> bindings, >> > another couple in the JavaHL tests. We're investigating those (and help >> is >> > of course appreciated), but the upshot is: there may be a 1.6.11 >> shortly. >> > >> > -Hyrum >> > >> >> http://svn.haxx.se/dev/archive-2010-03/0593.shtml >> > > Joe, > Thanks for the reminder. Merging the changed suggested here (r876245) does > indeed fix the test failure for me. > Joe, I'm happy to +0 this patch, since it fixes the failure for me. I've no idea what it's doing under the hood, though, so I'd feel more comfortable if you were able to +1 it. Thanks, -Hyrum
