On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 10:08 AM, C. Michael Pilato <cmpil...@collab.net> wrote: > On 07/26/2010 10:54 AM, Justin Erenkrantz wrote: >> On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 6:16 AM, Bert Huijben <b...@qqmail.nl> wrote: >>> (A much older suggestion was moving the code into svnsync as they are >>> related tools) >> >> I think either that or folding it into svnadmin itself. But, we don't >> need another tool program, IMO. -- justin > > I, too, was thinking about folding it into svnadmin. But svnadmin has > always been a server-side tool (it knows nothing of URLs and authorization > stuffs and ...) and I kinda think it would be really weird to change that. > There's (in my mind, at least) a much tighter philosophical connection with > svnsync anyway.
+1. The charter for svnadmin is currently, and should remain, solely focused on local access to a repository.
