On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 8:30 AM, Justin Erenkrantz <jus...@erenkrantz.com> wrote: > On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 8:10 AM, Hyrum K. Wright > <hyrum_wri...@mail.utexas.edu> wrote: >> +1. The charter for svnadmin is currently, and should remain, solely >> focused on local access to a repository. > > Why? > > svnadmin dump --remote <url> > > seems the most intuitive approach for this - as well as load, etc, etc. > > We don't differentiate local/remote in our client, so if our admin > tool can do the same, why kick it out to another tool? -- justin
But we do. 'svn' is a wrapper around svn_client/svn_ra. 'svnadmin' is a wrapper around svn_repos/svn_fs. 'svn' always refers to repositories via URLs. 'svnadmin' always (I think) refers to repositories via paths. 'svnadmin' does not have a dependency on Neon or Serf. I think this distinction is valuable. --dave -- glas...@davidglasser.net | langtonlabs.org | flickr.com/photos/glasser/
