> On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 4:19 PM, <phi...@apache.org> wrote: > > Author: philip > > Date: Fri Oct 15 14:19:36 2010 > > New Revision: 1022931 > > > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1022931&view=rev > > Log: > > Implement status using per-dir queries. On my machine (Linux, > local > > disk) this improves the speed of status on a Subversion trunk > working > > copy by a factor of 3, with a hot-cache, and about 30% with a > cold cache. > > 1.7 is still slower than 1.6 for the hot-cache (but it's less > than 100%), > > but for cold-cache 1.7 is now faster than 1.6. > > Now, that's more like it! > > On my machine (WinXP, 32 bit, local disk 5400 rpm), with a medium > size > working copy (944 dirs, 10286 files; same as I used in previous > tests > ([1])): > > - cold cache: 1.7 is almost 50% faster than 1.6 > 1.7: 22s > 1.6: 42s > > - hot cache: 1.7 is just about on par with 1.6 (only 20% slower) > 1.7: 0.86s > 1.6: 0.72s >
What do you guys mean by "cold cache" and "hot cache"? If they mean what I think they mean, wouldn't "hot cache" be faster that "cold cache" ? BOb
