> >> - cold cache: 1.7 is almost 50% faster than 1.6 > >> 1.7: 22s > >> 1.6: 42s > >> > >> - hot cache: 1.7 is just about on par with 1.6 (only 20% slower) > >> 1.7: 0.86s > >> 1.6: 0.72s > >> > > > > What do you guys mean by "cold cache" and "hot cache"? If they > mean what I think they mean, wouldn't "hot cache" be faster that > "cold cache" ? > > I think they are what you think. 22 seconds is slower than < 1s, > isn't it? >
DOH! I missed the .86s v 22s ... it's Friday afternoon... that is my excuse. Cheers, BOb
