Just thought of something. We might also be able to make some kind of call to other ASF people. [email protected] would be a good option.
On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 21:21, Greg Stein <[email protected]> wrote: > The development for 1.7.x is nearing completion. If the translators > could get caught up to *today*, then there shouldn't be much more work > to finalize the translations at branch time. > > I don't know if there is a translators mailing list (any more?), but a > call for updating translations would be good. Or maybe just an > explicit call on dev@, or a direct email to all our translators in > COMMITTERS. But a call would be a Good Thing. > > Cheers, > -g > > On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 18:33, Hyrum K. Wright > <[email protected]> wrote: >> Daniel made the astute observation on IRC this afternoon that our >> translation work has seen little work in the last while. In fact, >> doing some archaeology on the repo shows that many of the po files >> haven't been updated since the 1.6.0 release, almost 2 years ago. The >> current translation status is: >> >> Translation status report for r1033775 >> >> lang trans untrans fuzzy obs >> -------------------------------------- >> de 2033 110 209 192 >> es 1970 173 244 332 >> fr 2123 20 34 30 >> it 1821 322 447 155 >> ja 1961 182 315 579 >> ko 2009 134 158 172 >> nb 2021 122 164 302 >> pl 2054 89 114 75 >> pt_BR 1785 358 464 151 >> sv 1742 401 489 157 >> zh_CN 2072 71 110 78 >> zh_TW 1723 420 528 219 >> >> I am in the unfortunate position of being a monoglot, and therefore >> not able to contribute to this effort. But I did want to see if >> people a) think this is a problem, and b) feel we should be doing >> something to encourage existing translators or attract new ones. >> >> -Hyrum >> >
