On 10.02.2011 17:43, C. Michael Pilato wrote: > On 02/10/2011 11:28 AM, Philip Martin wrote: >> Suppose I have a directory tree: >> >> foo/ >> bar/ >> zig >> >> and I delete the tree foo/bar and replace it by a file foo/bar. What >> should "svn revert --depth=files foo" do? Should it revert foo/bar? >> How much of foo/bar should it restore? > It should restore foo/bar as a directory with all of its children still > scheduled for deletion, right?
What happens to the file that was foo/bar, if reverting replaces it with a directory of the same name, in light of the policy of not deleting local files? -- Brane
