"C. Michael Pilato" <cmpil...@collab.net> writes: > On 02/10/2011 11:28 AM, Philip Martin wrote: >> Suppose I have a directory tree: >> >> foo/ >> bar/ >> zig >> >> and I delete the tree foo/bar and replace it by a file foo/bar. What >> should "svn revert --depth=files foo" do? Should it revert foo/bar? >> How much of foo/bar should it restore? > > It should restore foo/bar as a directory with all of its children still > scheduled for deletion, right?
Perhaps, but if I deleted the tree foo/bar and didn't replace it with a file then the revert would skip foo/bar and leave it deleted. I would need to do "svn revert --depth=immediates" to revert foo/bar and leave the children deleted. Before revert: path op_depth 0 1 2 / normal foo normal foo/bar normal - normal foo/bar/zig normal - deleted Revert the added file to leave the deleted directory: path op_depth 0 1 2 / normal foo normal foo/bar normal - deleted foo/bar/zig normal - deleted Non-recursive revert on the directory: path op_depth 0 1 2 3 / normal foo normal foo/bar normal foo/bar/zig normal - - deleted So a replacement WORKING file changes depth=files into depth=immediates for those nodes? -- Philip