On 03/31/2011 11:04 AM, Mark Phippard wrote: > A user supplied me with results of running the benchmarks with 1.5, > 1.6 and 1.7 on Windows. I have updated the wiki with those results. > > There was one area of the tests that I thought were interesting, > because there is a massive regression in 1.6. The tests are with a > working copy that has folders with a couple thousand icons in it. I > mainly wanted to look for problems with a lot of files in one folder > as people on users@ had been complaining. You can see those results > here: > > https://ctf.open.collab.net/sf/go/wiki2115 > > Here are the average checkout/switch times: > > Checkout Switch > 1.5: 0:30 0:18 > 1.6: 7:40 7:15 > 1.7 2:14 1:46 > > So while 1.7 has made nice improvements over 1.6, there is still a > huge regression. I would blame it on tree conflicts, but would this > show up in a checkout (maybe because it shares code with update)? > Might be something for someone to look at.
Well, I just made switch slower yesterday, and knowingly so. At least, I made it do some extra up-front work to verify that the switch isn't potentially unwanted. My changes won't affect the time spent doing the actual work of the switch (and you can pass --ignore-ancestry if you know what you're doing and skip my extra logic altogether). -- C. Michael Pilato <[email protected]> CollabNet <> www.collab.net <> Distributed Development On Demand
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
