On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 11:04 AM, Mark Phippard <[email protected]> wrote:
> So while 1.7 has made nice improvements over 1.6, there is still a > huge regression. I would blame it on tree conflicts, but would this > show up in a checkout (maybe because it shares code with update)? > Might be something for someone to look at. >From IRC: <Bert> markphip: Know issue that regression 1.6 vs 1.5: Most of that is tree conflict processing Bert, I think it might be a bit dismissive to say this was a known issue. If you were to say it was known that these commands are slower in 1.6 I would probably agree with you, but I think these tests show a real problem. If you look at the results for a WC that is like our trunk, the performance difference is almost not measurable. If you look at a WC with a ton of folders, the performance difference is minor. In this one test with tons of files in a single folder the increase is dramatic. I doubt that was known and I am just saying it might point us to something in our algorithms that needs to be looked at. That was the point of these tests. -- Thanks Mark Phippard http://markphip.blogspot.com/
