On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 11:48 AM, C. Michael Pilato <[email protected]> wrote: > On 06/02/2011 11:52 AM, Hyrum K Wright wrote: >> Mike, >> Thanks for picking up the pieces here. A couple of thoughts: >> * Since the magic rev for the release is r1128011, the tag should be >> based on that revision, per HACKING (see [1]) >> * From that point, we should then merge to the tag the relavant >> revisions from 1.6.x to make the tag match the release. >> >> I feel that we should do the above, but would like to ensure I'm not >> alone in that feeling. > > Okey dokey. Whatever you feel is best. (Can I assume you'll be taking > these corrective measures yourself?)
Happy to do so, to ensure my internal correctness meter doesn't go haywire. :) -Hyrum
