On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 3:17 PM, C. Michael Pilato <[email protected]> wrote: > On 06/02/2011 04:11 PM, Hyrum K Wright wrote: >> On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 11:48 AM, C. Michael Pilato <[email protected]> >> wrote: >>> On 06/02/2011 11:52 AM, Hyrum K Wright wrote: >>>> Mike, >>>> Thanks for picking up the pieces here. A couple of thoughts: >>>> * Since the magic rev for the release is r1128011, the tag should be >>>> based on that revision, per HACKING (see [1]) >>>> * From that point, we should then merge to the tag the relavant >>>> revisions from 1.6.x to make the tag match the release. >>>> >>>> I feel that we should do the above, but would like to ensure I'm not >>>> alone in that feeling. >>> >>> Okey dokey. Whatever you feel is best. (Can I assume you'll be taking >>> these corrective measures yourself?) >> >> Happy to do so, to ensure my internal correctness meter doesn't go haywire. >> :) > > Heheh. I was merely thinking "He probably has a less manual process than > the one I employed." :-)
Done, with the last commit in r1130806. -Hyrum
